Author: Taylor Warfield, Former Bain Manager and interviewer

Last Updated: September 9, 2026

 

Kearney vs Strategy& comes down to a single trade: Kearney gives you independence and a world-class operations reputation, while Strategy& gives you higher reported median pay and the PwC network behind every project. Both sit in the tier right below MBB, so the choice is about the work you want on your resume in three years, not about which firm is more impressive.

 

Before reading on:

 

Most candidates struggle to land interviews and even fewer turn them into offers. Watch my free training to learn how to triple your chances of landing interviews and increase your chances of receiving an offer by 8x.

 

👉 Watch for free

 

Key Takeaways

 

Kearney is the stronger pick for operations, procurement, and supply chain work, while Strategy& is the stronger pick for corporate strategy, deals, and anyone who values a Big Four alumni network.

 

• Strategy& reports a higher median package on Levels.fyi, about $238,000 versus roughly $190,000 at Kearney in 2026

 

• Kearney rates higher with its own people on Glassdoor across culture, pay satisfaction, and career opportunities

 

• Kearney is independent and partner-owned, so consulting is the whole business rather than one arm of it

 

• Strategy& consultants pick an industry or capability team early, while Kearney keeps you a generalist for longer

 

• Both run two interview rounds, but Kearney leans on math and operations detail while Strategy& weighs fit more heavily

 

What Is the Difference Between Kearney and Strategy&?

 

Kearney is an independent, partner-owned global consulting firm founded in Chicago in 1926 and known for operations, procurement, and supply chain work. Strategy& is the strategy consulting arm of PwC, formed in 2014 when PwC acquired Booz & Company, and it focuses on corporate strategy and deals inside a Big Four network.

 

That ownership difference drives almost everything else. Kearney answers to its own partners, so consulting revenue is the only revenue. Strategy& sits inside a firm that also does audit and tax, which gives it enormous reach and also means strategy is one line of business among many.

 

Here is how the two firms compare on the basics.

 

Factor	Kearney	Strategy&
Founded	1926 in Chicago	1914 as Booz, rebranded in 2014
Ownership	Independent and partner-owned	Business unit of PwC
Headquarters	Chicago	New York City
Size	5,300+ employees, 60+ offices in 40+ countries	3,000+ employees inside PwC's global network
Revenue	About $2.0 billion in 2025	Not reported separately from PwC
Best known for	Operations, procurement, supply chain	Corporate strategy, deals, organization design
Career ladder	Business Analyst, Senior Business Analyst, Associate, Manager, Principal, Partner	Associate, Senior Associate, Manager, Director, Partner

 

Firm size and revenue figures for Kearney come from the firm's public reporting as summarized on Wikipedia in 2026. Strategy& headcount reflects the same source, since PwC does not break out its strategy arm separately.

 

How Do Kearney and Strategy& Salaries Compare?

 

Strategy& reports the higher median. Levels.fyi puts the median management consultant package at Strategy& near $238,000 in the United States as of 2026, against roughly $190,000 at Kearney. At undergraduate entry the two are close enough that pay should not decide anything.

 

Career stage	Kearney total comp	Strategy& total comp
Undergraduate entry	Business Analyst, about $106,000	Associate, about $111,000
Pre-MBA promotion	Senior Business Analyst, about $129,000	Senior Associate, about $220,000
Post-MBA entry	Associate, about $194,000	Senior Consultant, about $211,000
Senior leadership	Principal, about $383,000	Principal, about $326,000
Firm-wide median	About $190,000	About $238,000

 

All figures above come from Levels.fyi data for the management consultant track, checked in August 2026. Totals blend base salary and bonus.

 

Read the pre-MBA row carefully. Strategy&'s Senior Associate number looks wildly high next to Kearney's Senior Business Analyst, but that is a labeling artifact rather than a real $91,000 gap. Strategy& runs a shorter five-rung ladder, so its Senior Associate band absorbs people Kearney would call an Associate.

 

Having reviewed offer letters from across the industry for more than a decade, I would treat the two firms as roughly equal on cash at the same actual seniority. The honest gap shows up at Manager and above, where Strategy& benefits from PwC's larger bonus pool. If you want the full ladder for either firm, the level-by-level breakdowns of Kearney salary data go deeper than a single median can.

 

One warning on the Strategy& numbers: the Levels.fyi sample is smaller, so individual level medians bounce around more year to year. The Strategy& salary bands are best read as ranges rather than precise targets. Your office and your performance rating will move your package more than the firm choice will.

 

Which Firm Has the Stronger Brand and Prestige?

 

Strategy& carries slightly more brand weight in the United States and Europe, largely on the strength of its Booz heritage and the PwC name behind it. Kearney is stronger in Asia-Pacific and in any room where operations credibility matters. The gap either way is small enough that no recruiter will hold it against you.

 

Vault's 2026 prestige survey put Kearney fourth in Asia-Pacific with a score of 7.037, behind only McKinsey, BCG, and Bain. That is a genuinely strong showing in a region where the firm has operated since 1972. Strategy& declined to participate in Vault's main ranking, so it has no comparable score.

 

In my experience at Bain, both names cleared the bar instantly when we saw them on a resume. Neither is a firm you have to explain. What actually differentiates candidates from these firms later is the substance of what they worked on, which is why the practice area you land in matters more than the shield on your business card.

 

Where the two diverge is alumni network. Strategy& alumni plug into PwC's global network on top of the legacy Booz community, which is simply larger than what an independent firm can offer. Kearney counters with a tighter, more consistent alumni base concentrated in industrial, consumer, and operations leadership roles.

 

Both firms sit in the same competitive set as Oliver Wyman, L.E.K., Roland Berger, and Monitor Deloitte.

 

If you are still mapping the whole tier, comparing the top consulting firms side by side gives you a cleaner picture than any single head-to-head can. Prestige differences inside this group are smaller than candidates assume.

 

What Kind of Work Will You Do at Kearney vs Strategy&?

 

This is the question that should decide your offer. Kearney work skews toward how a company operates, and Strategy& work skews toward what a company should do next. Both firms do both kinds of project, but the center of gravity is clearly different.

 

What does a typical Kearney project look like?

 

Expect procurement, supply chain, cost transformation, and manufacturing footprint work. Kearney's published service lines include procurement, operations and performance, transformation, and its product renewal lab, which tells you where the firm makes its money. Its procurement practice is one of the most recognized in the industry.

 

A representative engagement looks like this: a manufacturer wants $200 million out of its cost base in 18 months, and your team maps the spend, consolidates the supplier list, and runs the negotiations. You will spend real time with plant managers and category buyers, not just in the boardroom.

 

That work is unglamorous and it is enormously valuable. Operations experience is one of the few consulting skill sets that private equity firms and industrial companies actively hunt for. It is also why Kearney cases so often end with a question about what the client does on Monday morning.

 

What does a typical Strategy& project look like?

 

Expect corporate strategy, growth strategy, commercial due diligence, and organization design. Strategy&'s capability set includes enterprise and functional strategy, sustainability strategy, the Katzenbach Center for organizational culture work, and Fit for Growth for cost restructuring. Its deals strategy work is a major pipeline in most offices.

 

A representative engagement looks like this: a private equity client is bidding on a target, and your team has three weeks to size the market, pressure-test the growth plan, and hand back a go or no-go view. The pace is faster and the deliverable is usually a decision rather than an implementation plan.

 

One structural difference catches candidates off guard. Strategy& asks you to join an industry or capability team early rather than staying a pure generalist, so you specialize sooner. That accelerates your depth and narrows your exposure at the same time, which is great if you already know your sector and limiting if you do not.

 

The other Strategy& advantage is what happens after the recommendation. Because PwC can staff the implementation, projects more often continue past the strategy phase. You will see your work get built more often than the average strategy consultant does.

 

How Do Culture and Work-Life Balance Compare?

 

Kearney rates higher with its own employees on nearly every Glassdoor dimension. Its overall rating sits at 3.9 out of 5 against 3.8 for Strategy&, and it leads on culture, pay satisfaction, and career opportunities. Neither firm scores well on work-life balance, which is normal for strategy consulting.

 

Glassdoor rating	Kearney	Strategy&
Overall rating	3.9	3.8
Culture and values	3.5	3.3
Compensation and benefits	4.2	3.9
Career opportunities	4.0	3.7
Work-life balance	2.6	2.7
Would recommend to a friend	67%	66%
Total reviews	2,976	1,938

 

Ratings reflect Glassdoor data as of August 2026. Kearney's larger review base makes its scores somewhat more stable.

 

Glassdoor's own side-by-side comparison of the two firms shows Kearney scoring higher in ten separate categories, including senior management, diversity, and business outlook. The same comparison flags that far more Kearney reviews list working hours as a downside. Read that as a firm whose people like the place and still work brutal weeks.

 

The cultural texture differs in a way ratings cannot capture. Kearney feels like an independent partnership: smaller offices, more visible partners, and a stronger sense that the firm rises or falls on consulting alone. Strategy& feels like an elite unit inside a very large organization, with the resources and the bureaucracy that implies.

 

Hours are demanding at both. Plan for 55 to 70 hour weeks during active projects at either firm, with travel depending heavily on your office and practice.

 

Which Firm Has Better Exit Opportunities?

 

Exits are strong from both, but they point in different directions. Kearney alumni concentrate in operations leadership, supply chain executive roles, and value creation seats at industrial companies. Strategy& alumni skew toward corporate strategy groups, deals roles, and the wider PwC ecosystem.

 

For a move into private equity, the two firms open different doors. Strategy& gives you more commercial due diligence reps, which is the standard currency in PE recruiting. Kearney gives you operating experience, which is exactly what value creation and operating partner teams want.

 

Business school is the most common exit at both firms, and both support it. Strategy& publicly offers full sponsorship to a top global MBA program for consultants who qualify, which is a real financial edge worth six figures. Kearney's support varies more by office and performance.

 

Neither firm closes the door on MBB. Having coached hundreds of candidates one on one, I see people move from both firms into McKinsey, BCG, and Bain every recruiting cycle, most often through an MBA rather than a direct lateral. Understanding how the tiers actually differ helps here, and the trade-offs between MBB and Big 4 consulting are more nuanced than the rankings suggest.

 

The pattern I have seen most often is simple. People who want to run something operational end up happier out of Kearney, and people who want to own strategy or capital allocation end up happier out of Strategy&.

 

How Do the Kearney and Strategy& Interview Processes Differ?

 

Both firms run two rounds of candidate-led case interviews, but the emphasis differs. Kearney puts you through five interviews and tests operations math hard. Strategy& runs four to five and gives the fit portion unusual weight, often a third of each interview.

 

Stage	Kearney	Strategy&
First round	Two 45-minute interviews, one case and one behavioral, with associates and managers	Two 45-minute interviews, each splitting fit questions and a case, with senior associates and managers
Final round	Three 45-minute interviews, two cases and one behavioral, with principals and partners	Two to three 45-minute interviews with directors and partners, one focused on fit
Case style	Candidate-led, heavy on operations, cost, and math	Candidate-led, heavy on market entry, growth, and deals
Extra screens	Some offices add an online assessment, written case, or group case	Some offices add PwC online assessments, a recorded video interview, or a written case
Fit weighting	Meaningful, with values-based questions in the final round	Very heavy, scored against PwC's professional framework

 

Kearney publishes guidance for candidates on its own interviewing page, and Strategy& lists open roles by region through its global careers site. Check both before you write a cover letter, because entry titles vary by office.

 

According to Glassdoor data covering 588 submitted interviews, the Kearney hiring process averages about 32 days from application to decision. That is enough runway to fix a real weakness if you start preparing now rather than the week before your first round.

 

The practical prep difference is what you drill. For a Kearney case interview, run cost structure, throughput, and supplier consolidation problems until the math is automatic. Say "consolidate from 80 suppliers to 30 through a competitive RFP" rather than "improve procurement," because specificity is what separates offers from dings here.

 

For a Strategy& case interview, drill market sizing, growth strategy, and due diligence cases instead. Then spend equal time on your answer to why this firm, because interviewers there are actively screening out people treating the firm as an MBB fallback. If you want to build both skill sets fast, my case interview course covers the frameworks and math drills in as little as 7 days.

 

Some Kearney offices also screen candidates with a timed online test before the first round. The Kearney recruitment test covers quantitative logic, data sufficiency, and chart interpretation, and it is a pure speed exercise that rewards practice.

 

Which Firm Should You Choose?

 

Choose based on the work, then the geography, then the pay. Comp is close enough at the same real seniority that letting a $10,000 difference decide a two to three year career move is a mistake.

 

• Choose Kearney if: you want operations, procurement, or supply chain depth, you value an independent partnership, or you are targeting Asia-Pacific

 

• Choose Strategy& if: you want corporate strategy or deals work, you want the PwC alumni network, or you are targeting the Middle East

 

• Choose Kearney if: you want to stay a generalist longer before committing to a sector

 

• Choose Strategy& if: you already know your industry and want to build depth in it immediately

 

• Choose either if: your real goal is an MBA and a shot at MBB afterward, because both firms are credible launchpads

 

One more filter that beats every ranking: the specific office. A strong Kearney office in your city with partners you connected with beats a mediocre Strategy& office two time zones away, and the reverse is equally true. Ask both firms which practice you would likely join and who would staff you.

 

If you are earlier in the process and still deciding where to apply, the summer programs are the highest-percentage entry point at both firms. A Kearney internship converts to a full-time offer at a high rate, and the same holds for the summer program on the Strategy& side.

 

The Kearney vs Strategy& decision is genuinely close on paper, so stop trying to rank the two firms and start ranking the work. Pick the one whose typical project you would be excited to explain in an interview three years from now, and prepare hard enough that you get to make the choice at all.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Is Kearney better than Strategy&?

 

Neither firm is objectively better, because they win on different things. Kearney rates higher with its own employees on Glassdoor and owns a stronger operations and procurement reputation. Strategy& reports higher median pay on Levels.fyi and gives you the PwC alumni network. Pick based on the work you want to do, not the logo.

 

Does Kearney or Strategy& pay more?

 

Strategy& reports the higher median. Levels.fyi lists the median Strategy& management consultant package at roughly $238,000 in the United States, against about $190,000 at Kearney as of 2026. At the undergraduate entry level the two are close, near $106,000 at Kearney and $111,000 at Strategy&, so the gap opens up further along the ladder.

 

Is Strategy& considered MBB?

 

No. MBB refers only to McKinsey, BCG, and Bain. Strategy& is the strategy consulting arm of PwC and sits in the tier just below MBB, alongside firms such as Kearney, Oliver Wyman, and EY-Parthenon. Its pay at senior levels can overlap with MBB, but its brand does not carry the same weight in most markets.

 

Which is harder to get into, Kearney or Strategy&?

 

Both run two rounds and both are highly selective, so the difficulty is comparable. Kearney runs five interviews across the two rounds and pushes harder on math and operations detail. Strategy& runs four to five and weighs the fit portion more heavily, which means a weak answer to why Strategy& can sink an otherwise strong candidate.

 

Can you move from Kearney or Strategy& to McKinsey, BCG, or Bain?

 

Yes, and it happens regularly at both firms. The most common route is business school: you spend two or three years at either firm, earn an MBA, then recruit for a post-MBA role at an MBB firm. Direct lateral moves also happen, though they usually cost you a level or leave you flat rather than moving you up.

 

Everything You Need to Land a Consulting Offer

 

Need help passing your interviews?

• Case Interview Course: Become a top 10% case interview candidate in 7 days while saving yourself 100+ hours
  
  
• Fit Interview Course: Master 98% of consulting fit interview questions in a few hours
  
  
• Interview Coaching: Accelerate your prep with 1-on-1 coaching with Taylor Warfield, former Bain interviewer and best-selling author

 

Need help landing interviews?

• Resume Review & Editing: Craft the perfect resume with unlimited revisions and 24-hour turnaround

 

Need help with everything?

• Consulting Offer Program: Go from zero to offer-ready with a complete system

 

Not sure where to start?

• Free 40-Minute Training: Triple your chances of landing consulting interviews and 8x your chances of passing them