Author: Taylor Warfield, Former Bain Manager and interviewer

Last Updated: September 25, 2026

 

Why Roland Berger is a fit interview question asking for specific reasons you want this firm over MBB or another strategy firm, and the best answers link its European origin, entrepreneurial culture, and industry depth to your own goals. This article gives you the structure interviewers score against, three sample answers you can adapt, and the firm facts that make your answer sound researched instead of rehearsed.

 

Before reading on:

 

Most candidates struggle to land interviews and even fewer turn them into offers. Watch my free training to learn how to triple your chances of landing interviews and increase your chances of receiving an offer by 8x.

 

👉 Watch for free

 

Key Takeaways

 

The strongest answer to why Roland Berger names two or three firm-specific reasons, backs each one with evidence, and closes by connecting those reasons to what you want from your own career.

 

• Specificity is the whole game: any reason that would still be true if you swapped in a different firm name scores zero

 

• Roland Berger is the only leading global strategy consultancy of European origin, and it remains independent and owned by its partners

 

• The firm reported record revenues of 1.01 billion euros in 2025 and has set a public target of 2 billion euros by 2028

 

• Its three stated values are entrepreneurship, excellence, and empathy, and the firm's own recruiters tell candidates to map their answers to them

 

• Keep the spoken answer to 60 to 90 seconds and open with your strongest reason, not your chronology

 

• Prestige, international travel, and compensation are the three reasons most likely to sink you

 

What Does "Why Roland Berger?" Really Test in a Consulting Interview?

 

Why Roland Berger tests three things: whether you researched the firm, whether your reasons are specific enough to be wrong if applied to a different firm, and whether what you want matches what the firm actually does. Interviewers also use it to predict whether you will accept an offer and stay past your second year.

 

That last point drives more of the scoring than candidates realize. Recruiting a consultant is expensive, and a hire who leaves after eighteen months is a loss the office feels directly.

 

Understand that fit and case are scored on separate sheets and both have to clear the bar. A brilliant firm answer will not rescue a broken Roland Berger case interview, and strong quantitative work will not save you if the interviewer decides you would take any offer you were given.

 

When I interviewed at Bain, the firm question was the fastest filter I had. A candidate who gave me a reason I had heard forty times that season told me they had done no work, and everything after that started from a deficit.

 

The question shows up throughout the process. Expect it in the screening conversation, again in a first-round Roland Berger behavioral interview, and often in a sharper form during the final round, where a partner may ask what would make you decline an offer.

 

It also appears in writing before you ever speak to anyone. The firm asks applicants to explain their motivation in a Roland Berger cover letter, so your reasons need to hold up on paper first.

 

What Makes Roland Berger Different From Other Consulting Firms?

 

Roland Berger differs from its peers on origin, ownership, and industry mix. It was founded in Munich in 1967 by a former Boston Consulting Group consultant, it never merged into a larger accounting or audit group, and its strongest practices sit in heavy industry rather than in technology or financial services.

 

Those three facts give you more usable material than anything on a rankings page. Here is what actually separates the firm, and the evidence behind each point.

 

Differentiator	The evidence	How to use it in your answer
European origin	The only leading global strategy consultancy founded in Europe, headquartered in Munich since 1967	Tie it to the client base you want: European industrials, family-owned firms, and public institutions
Independence	Wholly owned by its partners with no parent company and no audit arm	Connect it to freedom from conflicts of interest and to a partnership that answers to its own people
Growth trajectory	Record revenues of 1.01 billion euros in 2025, with a stated goal of 2 billion euros by 2028	Frame it as scale you want to help build rather than scale you want to hide inside
Industrial depth	Automotive, battery, energy, aerospace and defense, and water are core practices, not side bets	Name the one practice you want and the reason, ideally linked to your own background
Implementation focus	The firm states it does not only design strategies but helps clients execute them	Use it if you have operational experience and want work that ends in delivery, not a deck
Office autonomy	Culture, staffing, and sector focus vary meaningfully from one office to the next	Reference the specific office you applied to and what its teams are known for

 

Source: Roland Berger corporate and press materials, June 2026.

 

The growth story is the piece candidates most often miss. Roland Berger announced revenues of 1.01 billion euros for 2025, the strongest financial year in its history, and Global Managing Partner Stefan Schaible has publicly tied the firm's acquisition strategy to a 2 billion euro revenue goal for 2028.

 

Those acquisitions are concrete and recent. The firm completed its purchase of water and resource recovery specialist Amane Advisors in 2024, and in March 2026 it acquired Alexec Consulting, a Wroclaw-based battery and electric vehicle firm founded in 2020.

 

The battery move came with a number worth remembering. Roland Berger projects worldwide investment across the battery value chain of 850 to 900 billion euros by 2035, with European cell demand growing about 17% a year.

 

A candidate who cites that figure has clearly read the firm's own research. That single detail does more for you than three paragraphs about global reach and prestige.

 

How Do You Structure a Strong "Why Roland Berger?" Answer?

 

Use a three-part structure: lead with your single strongest reason, support each reason with one piece of specific evidence, then close by linking the reasons to your own trajectory. Aim for two or three reasons total and 60 to 90 seconds of speaking time.

 

1. The claim: state the reason in one sentence, phrased as something about the firm rather than something about you
   
   
2. The evidence: follow immediately with a fact, a project type, a practice name, or a conversation you had with someone at the firm
   
   
3. The link: explain in one sentence why that specific thing matters for the career you are trying to build

 

Order matters more than most candidates think. Interviewers form an impression in the first fifteen seconds, so your best reason goes first and your chronology goes nowhere.

 

There is a shortcut the firm hands you directly. On its own application Q and A page, a Roland Berger recruiter advises candidates to use the three corporate values as a final check: empathy means being authentic, excellence means showing your skills, and entrepreneurship means digging past the stated problem to the real one.

 

Map each of your reasons to one of those values before you walk in. If all three of your reasons land on the same value, you have a narrower answer than you think.

 

Delivery is the other half of the score. This kind of motivational question sits alongside behavioral stories in every round, and my fit interview course covers 98% of the questions you will face in a few hours.

 

What Are the Best Reasons to Give for Wanting to Join Roland Berger?

 

The best reasons are ones a candidate applying to a different firm could not honestly reuse. Below is how the most common reasons actually land in the room, ranked from the ones that cost you points to the ones that earn them.

 

Reason you give	How it lands	How to make it stronger
Prestige and reputation	Costs you points	Replace it entirely, since it signals you would take any brand-name offer
International exposure	Costs you points	Name the actual mechanism, such as the international station inside the Gap Year Program
Compensation and benefits	Costs you points	Leave it out of the answer completely and raise it at the offer stage instead
Smart, collaborative people	Neutral	Attach two names and what each of them told you that changed your view
Entrepreneurial culture	Good	Pair it with proof of your own initiative, since the value is about ownership rather than atmosphere
Specific industry practice	Strong	Cite a recent firm publication or acquisition in that practice and what it told you
Independence and partnership model	Strong	Explain the consequence you care about, such as long-term client relationships over quarterly targets
Implementation alongside strategy	Strong	Ground it in your own operational or engineering experience so it reads as preference, not flattery

 

Two of these deserve extra attention because they are underused. The independence point is a genuine structural difference, since the firm has no audit parent and answers only to its own partners.

 

The implementation point works especially well for anyone with a plant, supply chain, or engineering background. The firm says openly that it helps clients execute rather than stopping at the recommendation, which is exactly the kind of work a former operations manager should want.

 

Industry specificity is the reason that separates strong candidates from good ones. Wanting restructuring consulting work because you watched a supplier nearly fail is a reason nobody else in the room will give.

 

What Does a Strong "Why Roland Berger?" Answer Sound Like?

 

A strong answer sounds like a person who has already made the decision, not one who is auditioning reasons. Read the three below aloud and time them, then rebuild each one with your own evidence.

 

Sample answer: undergraduate applying to a European office

 

"Two things. The first is industrial depth. I studied mechanical engineering and I want to work on companies that build physical things, and Roland Berger's battery practice is doing exactly that work: your team published a projection of 850 to 900 billion euros of investment across the battery value chain by 2035, and you acquired Alexec in March to add factory ramp-up capability. Most strategy firms treat that market as one sector among many. The second is the Gap Year Program. I spoke with Lena, who did three months in Munich and three months at a start-up, and that structure told me the firm actually means what it says about entrepreneurship instead of putting it on a values page. I want to spend my first years close to manufacturing clients, and this is the shortest path I found to that."

 

Sample answer: MBA candidate

 

"I have three reasons and they build on each other. First, ownership. Roland Berger is still wholly owned by its partners, so decisions get made by people who carry the consequences, and I have spent two years watching a company do the opposite. Second, growth. The firm crossed one billion euros in revenue in 2025 and is publicly targeting two billion by 2028, which means the next five years involve building practices rather than maintaining them, and that is where I do my best work. Third, the client base. European industrials and family-owned businesses make decisions on a twenty-year horizon, and that is the kind of advising I want to learn. I could get scale at other firms. I could not get all three of these together anywhere else on my list."

 

Sample answer: experienced hire from industry

 

"I ran production planning at an automotive supplier for six years, and I watched three consulting teams come through. Two of them left a recommendation. The one that changed anything stayed for the implementation, and that difference is why I am here rather than at a firm that stops at the strategy. Roland Berger says plainly that it helps clients execute, and every consultant I spoke to described work that ran past the decision into the ramp-up. I also want to stay in industrials rather than being staffed across whatever comes in, and your automotive and operations practices are deep enough that I can. I bring the plant-floor credibility that makes those recommendations land, and I want the analytical training I never got."

 

Notice what none of these do. Not one opens with a life story, and not one uses the word prestige.

 

Each of them also names a person or a specific artifact. That is the single easiest upgrade available to you, and it takes one consulting coffee chat to earn.

 

What Mistakes Should You Avoid When Answering "Why Roland Berger?"

 

The most common failure is not a wrong answer but an interchangeable one. Here are the mistakes I saw destroy otherwise strong candidates.

 

• Reciting the values back: saying you admire entrepreneurship, excellence, and empathy without proving any of them reads as a website summary

 

• Leading with yourself: an answer that spends thirty seconds on your background before naming a single firm-specific reason has already lost the room

 

• Criticizing other firms: your interviewer likely trained with people at MBB and will not enjoy hearing them dismissed

 

• Using stale facts: citing an old revenue figure or a practice the firm has since restructured signals research you did once and never refreshed

 

• Going too long: past about two minutes the answer stops sounding like conviction and starts sounding like a memorized script

 

• Ignoring the office: Roland Berger offices differ substantially in culture and sector focus, so a purely global answer feels detached from the job you applied for

 

One more mistake deserves its own warning. Do not claim an interest in a practice you cannot discuss for sixty seconds, because a partner will ask a follow-up and the gap will be obvious.

 

How Do You Research Roland Berger Before Your Interview?

 

Good research takes about four hours spread over two weeks, and it produces material no generic answer can match. Work through these five steps in order.

 

Tip #1: Read the firm's own publications in one practice area

 

Pick the practice you want and read three of its recent reports end to end. You are looking for a claim you can repeat and a number you can cite, which is what turns a vague interest into a demonstrated one.

 

Tip #2: Track the firm's acquisitions and announcements

 

Acquisitions reveal strategy faster than any mission statement. The Amane Advisors and Alexec purchases both point the same direction: sustainability and industrial execution, bought rather than built.

 

Tip #3: Talk to two people who actually work there

 

Two conversations give you something no competitor can copy. Ask what surprised them in their first six months and what they would change, since the honest answer to the second question is the one you can reference later.

 

Tip #4: Research the specific office, not just the firm

 

Staffing models, sector mix, and culture vary from one location to the next more at this firm than at most. Knowing what your target office is known for lets you answer the follow-up about why that office without hesitating, and choosing the best Roland Berger office for your goals is worth real thought before you apply.

 

Tip #5: Write your answer down, then cut it in half

 

Draft the full version with every reason and every piece of evidence. Then cut it to the two or three reasons that are strongest and rehearse only those, because a tight answer with real evidence beats a complete one every time.

 

A quick note on where the research shows up. The same material that powers your firm answer also feeds the questions you ask at the end of the interview, so nothing you learn goes to waste.

 

How Should You Handle "Why Consulting?" and "Why This Office?"

 

Treat the three motivational questions as one connected story rather than three separate answers. Interviewers almost always ask them in sequence, and inconsistency between them is far more damaging than a weak individual answer.

 

Your why consulting answer should explain the type of problem you want to work on and the pace at which you want to learn. It sets up everything that follows, so keep it about the work rather than about the career ladder.

 

The firm answer then narrows that into why this particular firm solves those problems in a way you prefer. The office answer narrows it once more, into geography, sector mix, and the people you have actually met.

 

The test is simple. If your three answers could be shuffled and still make sense, they are too generic, and this same logic applies whenever you are asked why this firm at any employer.

 

Location deserves genuine thought at Roland Berger specifically. The firm's center of gravity remains in Europe, and consulting recruiting in Europe follows timelines and expectations that differ from the US process.

 

Compensation should stay out of all three answers, even though candidates research it heavily. Glassdoor data from May 2026 based on 284 US submissions puts reported pay between roughly $91,000 for a junior consultant and $291,000 for a principal, which is useful for evaluating an offer and useless as a reason to give an interviewer.

 

Your answer to why Roland Berger only works if it survives the follow-up, so build it from two or three reasons you can defend for two minutes each and drop everything you cannot. Do that work now, before the screening call, because the single most valuable thing you can bring into the room is a reason nobody else in the queue is able to give.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

How long should your answer to why Roland Berger be?

 

Keep it between 60 and 90 seconds, which works out to roughly 150 to 220 spoken words. That is long enough for two or three reasons with evidence behind each one, and short enough that the interviewer does not start looking for a way to cut you off. Written versions in a cover letter can run slightly longer because the reader controls the pace.

 

Should you mention MBB when explaining why you want Roland Berger?

 

You can reference the comparison, but never criticize another firm. Saying that you prefer Roland Berger's European client base and industrial focus to a generalist US model is a legitimate distinction. Saying that MBB consultants only produce slides is an insult to people your interviewer probably trained with, and it costs you the room.

 

Is it bad to say you applied to other consulting firms too?

 

No, and pretending otherwise is worse. Every interviewer knows candidates apply broadly. The honest framing is that you targeted a short list of firms with real industrial and transformation practices, and that Roland Berger sits at the top of it for reasons you can then name.

 

What if you have no connection to Europe or Germany?

 

You do not need one. The firm's European origin matters because of what it produces, which is a client base of industrial companies, family-owned businesses, and public institutions that most US-founded firms serve less often. Build your answer around the type of client work you want rather than around geography you cannot claim.

 

Do Roland Berger interviewers ask why Roland Berger in every round?

 

Expect it at least twice, and prepare for three times. It usually appears in the screening conversation, again in a first round fit interview, and often in the final partner interview in a sharper form such as what would make you turn us down. Keep the core reasons identical across rounds and vary only the depth and the examples.

 

Can you use the same answer for the cover letter and the interview?

 

Use the same reasons but not the same sentences. The written version should carry the specific evidence and the numbers, since the reader can reread it. The spoken version should compress that evidence into one clause per reason so it sounds like conversation instead of recitation.

 

Everything You Need to Land a Consulting Offer

 

Need help passing your interviews?

• Case Interview Course: Become a top 10% case interview candidate in 7 days while saving yourself 100+ hours
  
  
• Fit Interview Course: Master 98% of consulting fit interview questions in a few hours
  
  
• Interview Coaching: Accelerate your prep with 1-on-1 coaching with Taylor Warfield, former Bain interviewer and best-selling author

 

Need help landing interviews?

• Resume Review & Editing: Craft the perfect resume with unlimited revisions and 24-hour turnaround

 

Need help with everything?

• Consulting Offer Program: Go from zero to offer-ready with a complete system

 

Not sure where to start?

• Free 40-Minute Training: Triple your chances of landing consulting interviews and 8x your chances of passing them